​
Testing Gaps Analysis - Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

​
Executive Summary

A critical authentication bypass vulnerability was discovered that allowed unauthenticated access to the MCP server. This analysis explains why existing tests failed to catch it and provides actionable recommendations. Root Cause: All authentication tests operated at the unit level with mocked components. The vulnerability existed in the integration layer - specifically in the try-catch block in server.ts that caught authentication failures but continued processing with default values.

​
The Vulnerability That Slipped Through

Location: src/server.ts lines 335-361 (before fix) 
} catch (authError) {
  logger.warn("Authentication failed", {...});
  // Continue without auth for public tools  ⚠️ BYPASS
}

await registerToolsWithOfficialSDK(..., {
  customerId: customerId || 1,  // ⚠️ Default to customer 1
  scope3ApiKey: authContext?.apiKey || process.env.SCOPE3_API_KEY,  // ⚠️ Server master key
  scopes: authContext?.scopes || [],  // ⚠️ Empty = full access
});
Impact:
  • Anyone could connect without authentication
  • Access customer ID 1’s data
  • Use the server’s master API key
  • Execute any tool without scope restrictions

​
Why Existing Tests Didn’t Catch It

​
1. Over-Mocking Hid the Real Behavior

Existing Tests:
  • src/__tests__/authentication/api-key-authentication.test.ts - Tests API key parsing logic
  • src/__tests__/authentication/fastmcp-auth-middleware.test.ts - Tests middleware in isolation
  • src/__tests__/authentication/mcp-tool-integration.test.ts - Tests tool-level session validation
  • src/__tests__/auth/mcp-auth-dual.test.ts - Tests OAuth + API key dual auth logic
What they tested: ✅
  • API key format validation
  • Header extraction logic
  • Customer ID resolution
  • Session object structure
  • OAuth scope checking
  • Error message formatting
What they didn’t test: ❌
  • Actual HTTP request/response flow
  • Server startup with authentication
  • Express middleware → MCP session integration
  • The try-catch block behavior in server.ts
  • What happens when authentication fails at the HTTP layer

​
2. Test Doubles Always Succeeded

From fastmcp-auth-middleware.test.ts: 
/**
 * Test implementation that mimics the actual FastMCP authenticate function
 */
class FastMCPAuthMiddleware implements AuthenticationMiddleware {
  // Mock always throws errors correctly
}
Problem: Tests validated a reimplementation of auth logic, not the actual production code path. The mock always behaved correctly, but the real server.ts had a try-catch that swallowed authentication failures.

​
3. No End-to-End HTTP Tests

Missing:
  • Tests that make actual HTTP requests to /mcp endpoint
  • Tests that verify 401 Unauthorized responses
  • Tests that verify no fallback to default values
  • Tests of the complete authentication flow from HTTP → Express → MCP

​
What Tests Should Have Existed

​
Critical Missing Tests

​
1. HTTP Endpoint Security Tests

File: src/__tests__/integration/mcp-endpoint-security.test.ts 
describe("MCP Endpoint Security", () => {
  it("MUST reject requests with no authentication", async () => {
    const response = await request(app).post("/mcp").send({});
    expect(response.status).toBe(401);
  });

  it("MUST NOT allow fallback to customer ID 1", async () => {
    const response = await request(app).post("/mcp").send({});
    expect(response.status).toBe(401);
    // Verify no backend requests made with customerId: 1
  });

  it("MUST NOT use server's master API key", async () => {
    const response = await request(app).post("/mcp").send({});
    expect(response.status).toBe(401);
    // Verify process.env.SCOPE3_API_KEY never used
  });
});

​
2. Authentication Failure Path Tests

describe("Authentication Failure Handling", () => {
  it("MUST NOT continue execution after auth failure", async () => {
    // Test that catch block rejects, not continues
  });

  it("MUST validate authContext is complete", async () => {
    // Test: if (!authContext || !customerId || !apiKey) { reject }
  });
});

​
3. Static Analysis Tests

describe("Security Anti-Patterns Detection", () => {
  it("MUST NOT have dangerous fallback patterns", () => {
    const serverCode = fs.readFileSync("src/server.ts", "utf-8");

    expect(serverCode).not.toMatch(/customerId.*\|\|.*1/);
    expect(serverCode).not.toMatch(/apiKey.*\|\|.*process\.env/);
    expect(serverCode).not.toMatch(/catch.*continue without auth/i);
  });
});

​
Current Testing Pyramid vs. Needed

​
Current (Before Fix)

Unit Tests (auth logic)           ████████████ 95%
Integration Tests (HTTP)          █            5%
E2E Tests (server behavior)       ░            0%

Unit Tests (auth logic)           ██████       60%
Integration Tests (HTTP)          ████         30%
E2E Tests (server behavior)       ██           10%

​
Actionable Recommendations

​
Priority 1: CRITICAL (Implement Immediately)

✅ COMPLETED:
  • Security fix deployed to server.ts
  • Security fix deployed to official-sdk-registry.ts
  • Test files created (blocked by MSW setup)
⏳ BLOCKED:
  • src/__tests__/integration/mcp-auth-security.integration.test.ts - Created but blocked by MSW
  • Need separate vitest config for integration tests without MSW
Solution:
  1. Create vitest.integration.config.ts without setupFiles
  2. Run integration tests separately: npm run test:integration
  3. Add to CI/CD pipeline as separate job

​
Priority 2: HIGH (Within 1 Week)

1. Static Analysis Tests 
npm install --save-dev eslint-plugin-security
Create custom ESLint rules: 
rules: {
  "no-auth-fallbacks": {
    patterns: [
      /customerId.*\|\|.*\d+/,
      /apiKey.*\|\|.*process\.env/,
    ]
  }
}
2. Pre-commit Security Checks 
# .husky/pre-commit
npm run lint:security
npm run test:integration:security
3. CI/CD Security Validation 
# .github/workflows/security.yml
- name: Test Unauthenticated Access Blocked
  run: |
    npm start &
    sleep 5

    response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:3000/mcp)
    if [ "$response" != "401" ]; then
      echo "SECURITY FAILURE: Unauthenticated access not blocked"
      exit 1
    fi

​
Priority 3: MEDIUM (Within 1 Month)

1. Tool Execution Security Tests
  • Verify tools reject calls without session auth
  • Test tools don’t fall back to environment variables
2. Session Validation Tests
  • Test session creation requires complete auth
  • Test session reuse validates auth context
3. OAuth Token Validation Tests
  • Test JWT validation with real tokens
  • Test scope enforcement

​
Files Created

​
1. Security Fix Documentation

  • SECURITY_FIX.md - Details of the vulnerability and fix
  • TESTING_GAPS_ANALYSIS.md - This file

​
2. Integration Tests ✅ WORKING

  • src/__tests__/integration/mcp-auth-security.integration.test.ts - 16 HTTP security tests
  • vitest.integration.config.ts - Separate config without MSW
  • npm run test:integration - Run integration tests separately
Status: ✅ All 16 tests passing Test Coverage:
  • 🔴 5 tests: Reject unauthenticated requests (POST, GET, invalid keys)
  • 🔴 3 tests: No fallback to customer ID 1 or server master key
  • ✅ 4 tests: Authenticated access works correctly
  • ✅ 1 test: Public endpoints work without auth
  • 🛡️ 3 tests: Regression tests for the authentication bypass vulnerability
How to Run: 
# Run integration tests
npm run test:integration

# Watch mode
npm run test:integration:watch

​
3. Code Fixes

  • src/server.ts - Fixed authentication bypass
  • src/tools/official-sdk-registry.ts - Added defense-in-depth validation

​
Measuring Success

​
Before Fix

  • ❌ No tests for HTTP authentication
  • ❌ No tests for unauthenticated access rejection
  • ❌ No tests verifying no default fallbacks
  • ❌ 0% integration test coverage for auth

​
After Fix ✅ COMPLETE

  • ✅ Security vulnerability fixed
  • ✅ Defense-in-depth validation added
  • ✅ 16 integration tests written and passing
  • ✅ Separate vitest config for integration tests
  • ✅ npm scripts for running integration tests
  • ✅ Documentation created
  • ⏳ Pre-commit hooks for security checks
  • ⏳ CI/CD security validation
  • ⏳ Static analysis rules (ESLint)

​
Lessons Learned

​
1. Unit Tests Alone Are Insufficient for Security

Lesson: Authentication and authorization MUST have integration tests that exercise the full HTTP request flow. Action: Require HTTP-level tests for all security-critical code.

​
2. Mock-Heavy Testing Hides Integration Bugs

Lesson: When every component is mocked, integration bugs slip through. Action: Balance unit tests with integration tests. For security code, favor integration tests.

​
3. Test What Matters Most

Lesson: The vulnerability was in HOW components integrated, not in individual component logic. Action: Test the integration points, not just the components.

​
4. Security Needs Different Testing Strategy

Lesson: Security failures often happen at boundaries and integration points. Action:
  • Negative tests (what should fail)
  • Boundary tests (edge cases)
  • Integration tests (full flow)
  • Static analysis (patterns)

​
Next Steps

  1. Immediate: Deploy security fix to production
  2. This week: Create vitest.integration.config.ts and unblock tests
  3. This week: Add pre-commit hooks for security checks
  4. Next sprint: Add CI/CD security validation
  5. Next sprint: Implement static analysis rules

​
References

  • Security Fix: SECURITY_FIX.md
  • OAuth Scope Migration: OAUTH_SCOPE_MIGRATION.md
  • Integration Test Files: src/__tests__/integration/
  • Testing Expert Analysis: See original task analysis above

​
Conclusion

The authentication bypass vulnerability demonstrates why integration testing is not optional for security-critical code. Unit tests alone provided a false sense of security when the real vulnerability existed in how components integrated. Key Takeaway: For authentication and security code, ALWAYS test the complete HTTP request → response flow with real requests, not just mocked component behavior.